參考文獻

吳靖國（2004）。詩性智慧與非理性哲學－維柯「新科學」的教育學研究。台北：五南。

吳靖國（2005）。詩性智慧對後現代課程實踐的啟示。載於游家政主編：後現代課程－實踐與評鑑（頁 83-100）。台北：教材研究發展學會。

陳伯璋（2003)。實踐智慧與校長課程領導。發表於大陸課程教材研究所、香港中文大學、台北師範學院主辦：「課程領導與課程評鑑學術研討會」。大陸、蘭州：西北師範大學，10 月 7-8日。

歐用生（2004）。詩性智慧的課程領導。載於歐用生著：課程領導－議題與展望（頁 223-248）。台北：高等教育出版社。

歐用生（2006）。課程美學－教師即藝術家。載於歐用生著：課程理論與實踐。台北：學富出版社。

Apple, M. W. (2001). Educating the right way - Markets, standards, god, and inequality. N.Y.: Routledge Falmer.

Block, A. A. (1998). Curriculum as affichiste: Popular culture and identity. In W. Pinar (Ed.), Curriculum – Toward new identities (pp.325-341). New York: Garland Publishing, Inc.

Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. New York: Minton.

Doll, W. E. (2005). The culture of method. In W. E. Doll, M. J. Fleener, D. Trueit, J. S. Julien (Eds.),

Chaos, complexity, curriculum, and culture: A conversation (pp.21-75). New York: Peter Lang.

Fleener, M. J. (2005). Introduction - Chaos, complexity, curriculum, and culture: Setting up the conversation. In W. E. Doll, M. J. Fleener, D. Trueit, J. S. Julien (Eds.), Chaos, complexity, curriculum, and culture: A conversation (pp.1-17). New York: Peter Lang.

Foshay, A. W. (2000). The curriculum: Purpose, substance, practice. New York: Teachers College. Variations on a blue guitar - The Lincoln Center Institute on aesthetic education. New York: Teachers College Press.

Haggerson, N. L. (2000). Expanding curriculum research and understanding – A mytho-poeticperspective. New York: Peter Lang.

Hartley, D. (1997). Re-schooling society. London: The Falmer Press.

Huebner, D. (1966). Curriculum language and classroom meaning. In J. B. Macdonald, R. R. Leeper(1966), Language and meaning (pp.8-27). Washington, D. C.: ASCD.

Huebner, D. (1985). Spirituality and knowing. In E. Eisner (Ed.), Learning and teaching the ways ofknowing (pp.159-173). Chicago: National Society of Study of Education.

Huebner, D. (1999). The lure of the transcendent: Collected essays by D. E. Huebner. V. Hillis (Ed.),Mahwah, NJ: Erlbam.

Kesson, K. R. (1999). Toward a curriculum of mythopoetic meaning. In J. G. Henderson, K. R. Kesson (Eds.), Understanding democratic curriculum leadership (pp.84-105). N.Y.: Teachers College.

Kesson, K. R., Oliver, D. (2002). On the need for the re-conceptualized theory of experience. In W. Doll, N. Gough (Eds.), Curriculum vision (pp.185-197). New York: Lang.

Macdonald, J. B. (1988). Theory-practice and the hermeneutic circle. In W. Pinar (Ed.), Contemporary curriculum discourses (pp.101-113). Arizona: Gorsuch Scarisbrick.

Morris, M. (2004). Stumbling inside dis/position: The un(home)of education. In W. M. Reynolds, J. A. Webber (Eds.), Expanding curriculum theory - Dis/position and lines of flight (pp.83-104). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Pinar, W. F., Grumet, M. R. (1976). Toward a poor curriculum. IA: Kendall Hunt.

Pinar, W. F., Reynolds, W. M., Slattery, P., Taubman, P. M. (1995). Understanding curriculum - An introduction to the study of historical and contemporary discourses. N.Y.: Peter Lang.

Roy, K. (2003). Teachers in nomadic spaces - Deleuze and curriculum. New York: Peter Lang.
Schwab, J. (1969). The practical – The language of curriculum. School Review, 74.

Shotter, J. (2005). Bringing corporeal life back in: Chiasmic relations and poetic understanding. In W. E. Doll, M. J. Fleener, D. Trueit, J. S. Julien (Eds.), Chaos, complexity, curriculum, and culture: A conversation (pp.195-208). New York: Peter Lang.

Slattery, C. P. (1995). Curriculum development in the postmodern era. N.Y.: Garland.

Sumara, D. J., Davis, B. (1998). Unskinning curriculum. In W. Pinar (Ed.), Curriculum - Toward new identities (pp.7.75-92). New York: Garland Publishing, Inc.

Trueit, D. (2005). Watercourses: From poetic to poietic. In W. E. Doll, M. J. Fleener, D. Trueit, J. S. Julien (Eds.), Chaos, complexity, curriculum, and culture: A conversation (pp.77-99). New York: Peter Lang.

Wang, H. (2002). The call from the stranger: Dwayne Huebner’s vision of curriculum as a spiritual journal. In W. Doll, N. Gough (Eds.), Curriculum vision (pp.287-299). New York: Lang.

Webber, J. A., Reynolds, W. M. (2004). Afterward: Multiplitics and curriculum theory. In W. M. Reynolds, J. A. Webber (Eds.), Expanding curriculum theory - Dis/position and lines of flight (pp.203-209). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

（原載：台灣課程與教學季刊 2007, 10(3), 頁 1～16；作者現職：大同大學講座教授暨 國立台北教育大學名譽教授）

[研究方法] 歐用生·詩性智慧及其對課程研究之啟示

歐用生：教師的課程理論化：從詩性智慧到 A/r/t

唐亞華　翟婷婷《道家詩性精神——兼與海德格爾比較》評介

顏崑陽：詩是智慧的燈：「詩性心靈」特質與「詩意義」的感發

劉曉春·維柯的「詩性智慧」── 民俗學史的視野

趙曉彬《詩性功能》

伽達默爾：「體驗」一詞的歷史

萬建中·構建以「講述」為中心的故事學範式

張多·抖音里的神話：移動短視頻對中國神話傳統的重構

劉士林：生態美學與詩性智慧的現代復活

劉陽 ·文學「詩性」的語義學考察——以新時期中國文學研究為背景

朱 竑，高 權〈西方地理學「情感轉向」與情感地理學研究述評〉