Comment

Comment by Dokusō-tekina aidea 4 hours ago

愛墾APP: 维雅克对“詩性”的共识

维柯（Giambattista Vico）、雅各布森（Roman Jakobson）和克里斯蒂瓦（Julia Kristeva）三人虽然分别从不同的理论背景和时代出发讨论了“诗性”（the poetic），但他们的思想中确实存在一些相同点，尤其是在语言、想象力、情感以及创造性等方面的理解上：

诗性作为创造力的核心

维柯：在《新科学》中，维柯强调诗性智慧（poetic wisdom）是人类原初思维的方式，是一种通过想象和隐喻来理解世界的能力。他认为最早的人类用诗性智慧来解释自然现象，通过神话、隐喻和象征创造出文化、宗教和历史。诗性在维柯的理论中被视为人类心灵对世界进行“诗化”的一种认知方式，是创造文化和文明的根基。

雅各布森：雅各布森则把诗性视为语言的一个核心功能。他提出的“诗性功能”强调语言的形式特征和自指性，认为诗性在于对语言本身的关注，通过修辞、音韵、节奏等形式技巧来创造出审美效果和情感共鸣。诗性功能不局限于诗歌，而是体现了语言的一种创造性运用。

克里斯蒂瓦：克里斯蒂瓦强调诗性语言在打破常规意义和结构中的创造性功能。她认为，诗性语言通过潜意识、情感和身体体验来构建意义，是一种突破常规符号系统的“符号性”（semiotic）表达。诗性语言能打破社会与语言的固定结构，带有强烈的解构与重构的创造性。

 

语言与形式的自指性

维柯：尽管维柯没有明确用“自指性”这个术语，但他强调诗性智慧中语言和象征的自发性创作，语言本身成为文化的创造力量。原始人类通过语言和象征来理解世界，并在这个过程中创造了神话与宗教，语言不仅是传达意义的工具，更是人类对世界进行诗化和象征化的手段。

雅各布森：雅各布森明确提出了语言的自指性，特别是在诗性功能中，语言不只是传递信息或描述现实，而是自我关注，通过对形式的精心操作（如音韵、节奏、重复等），引导读者或听众关注语言本身的美感和结构。

克里斯蒂瓦：克里斯蒂瓦进一步发展了这一点，特别是在她的“符号性”与“象征性”区分中。符号性是诗性语言的核心部分，强调语言的情感、潜意识层面，语言不再仅仅是逻辑的或理性的符号系统，而是可以通过音韵、节奏、重复等手段打破象征性秩序，使语言具有一种流动性、感性的自指性。

Comment by Dokusō-tekina aidea 4 hours ago

情感与身体经验的融合

维柯：维柯的诗性智慧是一种情感的、身体性的认知方式，早期人类通过身体感知和情感体验来理解自然和世界，语言和象征就是这种体验的具象化表达。诗性智慧不仅仅是理性的表达，而是通过情感和想象力来建构文化。

雅各布森：雅各布森的诗性功能虽然更多集中在语言的形式特征上，但他同样关注语言如何通过音韵、节奏等形式手段来唤起情感的共鸣。诗歌中的韵律、重复等结构化语言操作，能让听者或读者感受到情感的律动，语言成为情感传递的媒介。

克里斯蒂瓦：克里斯蒂瓦对诗性语言的分析特别强调了身体经验和情感的融合。她提出的“符号性”部分本质上是身体的节奏和情感的流动，是潜意识的表达方式。诗性语言因此能够承载和传递未被逻辑结构所捕捉的情感体验。

 

隐喻与象征的运用

维柯：维柯强调了隐喻和象征作为诗性智慧的基本工具，通过这些手段，早期人类创造了宗教、神话等文化形式。隐喻不仅是一种语言技巧，也是人类早期心智对世界的象征化理解。

雅各布森：雅各布森的诗性功能分析中，隐喻（metaphor）和转喻（metonymy）是两种重要的修辞手段。他将隐喻视为语言的一种创造性运用，通过把两种看似无关的事物联系在一起，创造新的意义。

克里斯蒂瓦：克里斯蒂瓦也非常重视隐喻的使用，尤其是在打破常规语言结构时，隐喻作为符号性的一部分，能够揭示潜在的情感和潜意识的意义。她认为隐喻和象征的解构与重构是诗性语言创造性的重要特征。 

突破常规符号系统

维柯：维柯的诗性智慧本质上就是一种早期人类通过创造性的语言和象征系统来理解和解释世界的方式。它打破了纯粹的逻辑和理性框架，通过想象力、隐喻和象征来建构文化。

雅各布森：雅各布森的诗性功能也是对日常语言功能的突破，诗性语言不再仅仅关注于信息的传递或意义的精确表达，而是通过形式上的操作来创造美感和情感。

克里斯蒂瓦：克里斯蒂瓦的符号性概念则进一步挑战了语言的象征性结构，她认为诗性语言通过打破常规的符号系统，释放出潜意识的力量。这种语言形式具有流动性、情感性，能够揭示理性系统之外的意义。

维柯、雅各布森与克里斯蒂瓦三人在讨论“诗性”时，都强调了语言的创造性、情感性和形式性，并通过各自的方式揭示了诗性语言如何打破常规结构，创造新的美学和认知体验。他们共同关注语言的形式及其如何成为表达情感、想象力和文化意义的工具，也都认为诗性不仅仅局限于诗歌，而是存在于更广泛的文化、语言和思想领域。

Comment by Dokusō-tekina aidea yesterday

APP Iconada: Unification of Framework - Poetics & Translation at Higher  Level

Peter Newmark’s framework of translation functions draws inspiration from Roman Jakobson’s model of the six functions of language, though Newmark adapts and refines these functions specifically for translation studies. Here’s how Newmark’s and Jakobson’s frameworks correspond:

1. Referential Function (Jakobson) / Referential Function (Newmark)

Jakobson’s Referential Function refers to language that conveys factual information or describes the external world (context). It is concerned with the subject matter or referent.

Newmark’s Referential Function directly aligns with this, as it applies to texts that aim to provide information, such as technical manuals, scientific papers, and reports. Translation focuses on accuracy and clarity of the conveyed information.

2. Expressive Function (Jakobson) / Expressive Function (Newmark)

Jakobson’s Expressive Function involves language used to express the speaker’s emotions, feelings, and attitudes. It highlights the speaker's subjectivity.

Newmark’s Expressive Function parallels this, focusing on texts where the author’s personal expression and creativity are central, such as in literature, poetry, and personal writings. Translators aim to maintain the tone, style, and subjective feelings of the original author.

3. Conative Function (Jakobson) / Vocative Function (Newmark)

Jakobson’s Conative Function refers to language that aims to influence or direct the behavior of the receiver. It’s often found in commands, requests, and persuasive language.

Newmark’s Vocative Function corresponds directly to this. He uses the term "Vocative" to emphasize that the text "calls upon" the reader or listener to respond or act. This applies to advertisements, instructions, and persuasive discourse. The goal of translation here is to retain the original intent to influence the reader’s actions.

4. Phatic Function (Jakobson) / Phatic Function (Newmark)

Jakobson’s Phatic Function is used to establish, maintain, or terminate communication channels, ensuring that communication continues smoothly (e.g., greetings, small talk).

Newmark’s Phatic Function mirrors this, emphasizing language that builds or maintains social relations. In translation, cultural context is essential to ensure social cues and conventions are respected.

5. Metalingual Function (Jakobson) / Metalingual Function (Newmark)

Jakobson’s Metalingual Function involves language used to explain or discuss language itself, such as definitions or clarifications.

Newmark’s Metalingual Function is similarly concerned with texts that discuss language, such as grammar books or dictionaries. Translators must ensure that linguistic clarity and accuracy are maintained in the target language.

6. Poetic Function (Jakobson) / Aesthetic Function (Newmark)

Jakobson’s Poetic Function focuses on the aesthetic and form-related aspects of language, where the message is constructed with attention to beauty, rhythm, sound, and stylistic choices.

Newmark’s Aesthetic (or Poetic) Function echoes this, particularly in literary and artistic texts where the form is just as important as the content. The challenge in translation is balancing fidelity to the original meaning with the aesthetic qualities of the text, such as rhythm, meter, and wordplay.

Comment by Dokusō-tekina aidea yesterday

Differences

Jakobson’s Model focuses on the broad linguistic functions of language in communication, applicable across many fields of study (linguistics, communication, etc.).

Newmark’s Model adapts Jakobson’s functions specifically for translation. His framework provides practical insights for how a translator should approach different types of texts based on their primary function. For instance, his Vocative Function highlights the pragmatic need to persuade or influence the audience, which is particularly relevant in translation contexts like advertising or instructional texts.

In summary, Newmark’s functions are a more focused adaptation of Jakobson’s linguistic model, designed to assist translators in understanding the purpose of different text types and how to best translate them to achieve the same communicative effect.

In "A Textbook of Translation," Peter Newmark classifies texts into six types based on their function and purpose, which helps guide the translation strategy. Here are the six classifications:

1. Expressive Texts: These texts focus on the creative and aesthetic expression of the author.
The emphasis is on the artistic use of language, style, and individual expression. Examples include literary works like poetry, novels, plays, and personal essays.

2. Informative Texts: The primary aim of these texts is to communicate information, facts, or knowledge. The content is objective, focusing on clear and precise communication. Examples include textbooks, reports, news articles, and manuals.

3. Vocative (or Operative) Texts: These texts are designed to persuade, convince, or appeal directly to the reader or listener, often prompting action. The language is directive, engaging, and designed to affect the audience’s behavior or attitude. Examples include advertisements, speeches, instructions, and political propaganda.

4. Phatic Texts: The main purpose of these texts is to establish or maintain social relationships rather than convey information. They often include routine, conversational, or formulaic language. Examples include social greetings, small talk, and some forms of correspondence like letters or casual emails.

5. Aesthetic-poetic Texts: These texts combine expressive and vocative elements, often focusing on the beauty of language, sound, and rhythm, as well as the emotive effect on the reader. This category can overlap with expressive texts but emphasizes the artistic and evocative qualities.

6. Metalingual Texts: These texts discuss language itself, often explaining or analyzing language use, rules, or grammar. Examples include linguistic articles, style guides, and language teaching materials.

These classifications help translators understand the primary function of a text, guiding them in making decisions that best preserve the original’s intent and impact in the target language.

Comment by Dokusō-tekina aidea yesterday

愛墾APP: 認知詩學批判：重新發現洛特雷阿蒙

從認知詩學的角度來看，洛特雷阿蒙的作品，如《馬爾多羅之歌》（Les Chants de Maldoror），可以通過以下幾個方面展開新的探索和發現——

讀者體驗與感知

認知詩學關注讀者如何通過心理和認知過程理解和感受文本。洛特雷阿蒙的詩歌充滿了超現實的意象和難以捉摸的敘述，讀者在處理這些非線性、不穩定的敘述時，其認知負荷可能會增加。這種複雜性可能激發讀者更深層次的情感反應和心理參與。分析這些過程可以揭示洛特雷阿蒙如何通過語言和意象調動讀者的認知資源。

情感與象征的交互

洛特雷阿蒙的作品充滿了強烈的情感張力和象征性意象。認知詩學可以幫助墾友理解這些象征如何在讀者的心智中形成，並與個人的情感體驗發生共鳴。例如，《馬爾多羅之歌》中反覆出現的暴力、死亡等主題可能引發讀者的情感共鳴或反感，這些情感反應可以通過認知機制來分析。

創造性語言與意義生成

洛特雷阿蒙的語言富有創造性和顛覆性，常常打破傳統的語法和邏輯結構。從認知詩學角度，研究他如何通過語言的變異和意象的重組來打破讀者的預期，這可以揭示他如何挑戰和重塑意義生成的過程。

多模態理解

認知詩學還涉及多模態文本的理解，洛特雷阿蒙的作品中常常出現視覺和聽覺意象的交織。分析這些多模態意象如何通過認知加工在讀者腦海中形成復合的感知體驗，可以為研究其作品提供新的視角。

跨文化認知對比

洛特雷阿蒙的作品在不同文化背景下可能會引發不同的認知反應。通過跨文化的認知對比研究，可以探討不同文化背景下的讀者如何理解和回應他的詩歌，從而揭示文本在不同認知環境中的多樣性。

從認知詩學的角度批判洛特雷阿蒙的作品，不僅可以深入理解他詩歌中的複雜情感和象征，還可以揭示這些元素如何通過讀者的認知和心理過程被體驗和生成。

註：洛特雷阿蒙的詩作，是克里斯蒂瓦在《詩性語言革命》一書中所討論的詩人之一。

Comment by Dokusō-tekina aidea on Wednesday

爱垦APP: 维柯·尼采·佛洛伊德·克里斯蒂瓦

維柯對尼采（Friedrich Nietzsche）和佛洛伊德（Sigmund Freud）的思想沒有直接的影響，但他的思想確實預示了一些他們後來發展的核心觀念，因此可以說在某些方面存在間接的影響或思想上的相似性。

尼采與維柯

詩性智慧與尼采的「權力意志」：維柯強調人類早期通過神話和隱喻來理解世界，而尼采也認為人類通過藝術和象徵來賦予生活意義。尼采的「權力意志」概念表現出一種類似於維柯詩性智慧的思想，即創造力和意志在構建世界觀中的核心作用。

文化與歷史循環觀：維柯提出了文明發展的循環觀，認為歷史是反復的，而非直線的。尼采在其《悲劇的誕生》中也探討了文化的循環，特別是藝術的衰落與再生。雖然尼采可能沒有直接受到維柯的影響，但兩者的思想在處理歷史和文化發展的非線性特質時存在相似之處。

佛洛伊德與維柯

隱喻與無意識：維柯強調早期人類通過隱喻來理解世界，這與佛洛伊德對無意識的研究有一定的相似性。佛洛伊德認為，隱喻和象徵是無意識思想的一部分，並通過夢境等方式表達出來。雖然佛洛伊德沒有直接引用維柯，但他們都關注隱喻在構建人類心理和文化中的作用。

神話與心理分析：維柯將神話視為早期人類理解世界的工具，這些神話反映了集體智慧。佛洛伊德則將神話與心理分析聯繫起來，認為神話故事往往反映了集體無意識或心理衝突的表現，例如他對奧狄浦斯情結的分析。這種對神話的解讀方式與維柯的思想在方法論上有一定的共鳴。

雖然維柯對尼采和佛洛伊德的影響不是直接的，但他們三人在思想上存在一些共通點。維柯對神話、隱喻和文化發展的理解預示了，尼采和佛洛伊德在後來的哲學和心理學研究中的一些重要概念。因此，雖然沒有明確的證據表明尼采和佛洛伊德直接受到維柯的影響，但他們在處理人類文化、思想和無意識領域的時候，展示了某些思想的共鳴。

Comment by Dokusō-tekina aidea on Wednesday

克里斯蒂瓦和維柯

維柯的“詩性思維”（sapienza poetica）與朱莉亞·克里斯蒂瓦（Julia Kristeva）的“符號態”（the semiotic）雖然來自不同的理論背景和時代，但兩者在探討人類思維、語言和文化的原初形式方面有一定的相似性。這些相似性可以通過以下幾個方面來理解：

原始經驗的表達方式

詩性思維：維柯的“詩性思維”指的是早期人類通過詩歌、神話和隱喻來理解和解釋世界的方式。在維柯看來，這種思維是人類最初的智慧形式，先於理性思維，並且通過具象和情感化的方式來表達對世界的理解。

符號態：克里斯蒂瓦的“符號態”是指在語言形成之前或與語言並行的、以情感、節奏、聲音和非理性元素為特徵的表達方式。這種態勢與拉康（Lacan）所描述的“鏡像階段”或“想像界”有關，是語言符號（the symbolic）系統形成之前的混沌狀態。

語言的起源與功能

語言的詩意起源：維柯認為語言起源於詩意的隱喻和象徵，這些語言符號最初是通過對自然現象的擬人化和神話化來創造的。這些符號不僅是交流的工具，更是表達和塑造人類經驗的手段。

符號態中的語言：在克里斯蒂瓦的理論中，符號態是語言形成的潛在動力。語言中的符號態元素，比如詩歌中的韻律、聲音和重複，體現了人類思維的情感和非理性層面。符號態與語言的符號系統相互作用，使語言不僅僅是一種理性交流的工具，而是包含了無意識和情感的表達。

文化與個體發展的過程

文化演進：維柯認為人類文化經歷了從神話和詩意思維向理性思維的轉變，但這種轉變並不是完全的消除，而是反映了文化發展的循環。詩性智慧在文化的不同階段仍然發揮著作用，特別是在藝術和宗教中。

心理發展：克里斯蒂瓦將符號態看作是個體心理發展的一個階段，尤其是在嬰兒早期的無意識狀態。隨著個體進入語言的符號系統，符號態並不消失，而是持續存在於藝術、詩歌和情感表達中。

詩性智慧與符號態在藝術中的表現

藝術作為詩性智慧的延續：維柯認為藝術和神話都是詩性智慧的延續，它們以象徵和隱喻的形式表達人類對世界的理解。這些藝術形式具有深刻的文化意義，是人類集體經驗的反映。

符號態在藝術中的作用：克里斯蒂瓦強調，符號態在藝術中特別重要，因為它能夠打破語言的理性結構，釋放出無意識的力量和情感。藝術中的符號態表現為超越語言符號系統的元素，如聲音、節奏和視覺象徵，這些都直接影響觀者或讀者的情感和心理反應。

維柯的“詩性思維”和克里斯蒂瓦的“符號態”雖然處於不同的理論框架下，但它們都強調了人類思維和表達形式中的非理性、情感化和象徵性的層面。兩者都認為，這些原初的思維方式不僅是人類文化的基礎，而且在現代藝術和詩歌中繼續發揮著重要作用。通過比較，這些概念可以幫助我們更全面地理解人類思維的複雜性以及語言和藝術的多重功能。这一切，都有助于我们开发新文创。

Comment by Dokusō-tekina aidea on September 21, 2024 at 6:39pm

愛墾APP: 狄尔泰和维柯拼体验经济

狄尔泰（Wilhelm Dilthey）“认知体验”（Das Erleben）和维柯的“诗性思维”（Pensiero poetico）对现代管理的挑战主要涉及如何理解和应对组织中的人类体验和创造性。

狄尔泰的认知体验：个体理解与共情：狄尔泰强调个体的主观体验，管理者需要深入理解员工的情感和认知状态，以提升组织的沟通和合作效果。这意味着在制定决策时需要考虑员工的感受和经验，增强员工的参与感和满意度。

经验与知识整合：现代管理中，需要将个体的主观经验与组织的客观数据结合起来，进行全面的决策。这可能挑战传统基于数据的决策模式，需要在科学分析与人文关怀之间找到平衡。

2维柯的诗性思维（Pensiero poetico）：创造性与创新：维柯的诗性思维强调通过创造性和象征性的方式理解世界。在管理中，这要求管理者不仅仅依赖于逻辑和分析，还要鼓励创造性思维和新颖的解决方案。这对推动创新和应对复杂问题尤为重要。

历史与文化背景：维柯关注历史和文化对认知的影响。在管理实践中，需要理解和尊重不同文化和历史背景对员工行为和组织文化的影响，以更好地制定策略和管理变革。

综合来看，将这两种思维方式应用于现代管理，需要管理者在面对挑战时，既关注员工的主观体验和情感需求，又要鼓励创造性思维和创新，同时考虑历史和文化因素的影响。这种综合性的方法有助于提升组织的适应能力和创造力。

狄尔泰的“认知体验”理论对体验经济具有深远的影响。体验经济强调通过提供独特的、沉浸式的体验来创造经济价值。对用户内在体验和情感反应的深刻理解，无疑有助企业创造更具吸引力和个性化的体验。

深入理解用户体验：狄尔泰的认知体验理论强调个人如何通过内心的感知和反思来理解世界。这为体验经济提供了一个理论基础，帮助企业深入理解用户在体验过程中如何构建意义和情感。通过理解这些内在的体验过程，企业可以设计出更符合用户需求的沉浸式体验。

增强个性化：体验经济注重个性化和定制化的服务。狄尔泰的理论提醒我们，个人的认知体验是主观且独特的，这促使企业在设计体验时考虑个体差异，提供更符合个人认知和情感需求的定制服务。

创造深层次的情感连接：狄尔泰强调体验的深度和情感维度，这对体验经济至关重要。通过打造能够引发深层次情感反应的体验，企业可以建立更强的用户忠诚度和情感连接，从而提升品牌价值和市场竞争力。

促进文化和社会意义的融入：狄尔泰的理论也涉及到文化和社会背景对认知体验的影响。体验经济中的产品和服务不仅是功能性的，还可以承载文化和社会意义。理解这些背景有助于设计出更具文化深度和社会价值的体验。

狄尔泰的“认知体验”理论强调了个人在特定情境中如何通过感知、理解和体验形成对世界的认知。

消费者体验：文化创意产业往往依赖于观众或消费者的情感和认知体验。通过深刻的认知体验，企业可以设计出更具吸引力的文化产品，使其能够引发观众的共鸣和参与感。

创作灵感：创作者可以从狄尔泰的理论中获得灵感，通过理解不同文化背景下的认知方式，创造出更具文化深度和多样性的作品。

市场定位：了解目标受众的认知体验，有助于企业精准定位市场。根据不同文化群体的认知特征，文化创意产品可以更加贴近消费者需求，提升市场竞争力。

文化传播：文化创意产业不仅创造产品，还承担着文化传播的任务。通过设计富有认知体验的内容，能够更有效地传播和弘扬文化价值观。

[爱垦APP情动转折 Affects-Percepts-Powers] 2025，愛墾網創立16載；陳明發博士在从事人力资源開發16年的基础上，轉入文創研究與推廣至今也已28年。浮生44个春秋，雖不算焦頭爛額也沒啥獎項可領，但自告奮勇的事還幹得不少。實踐多了，面對自己原創的或經手發佈出去的6萬筆左右內容，多少有些领悟。自信還有點前瞻的價值。現陸續整理出來，答謝這麼多年來默默支持著我們的國內外友好。有些事恐怕不是一代人能完成的，更不是一個人可能完成。現留點檔案，有緣並有能力的人若及時看到，對鄉土轉型或有參考價值。

Comment by Dokusō-tekina aidea on September 20, 2024 at 6:23pm

APP Iconada：Gilles Deleuze's Role in the New Philosophy for Global Cultural & Creative Economy

[A: Affects P: Percepts P: Powers]

Gilles Deleuze's philosophy offers a rich and transformative framework that could indeed play a significant role in shaping a new philosophy for the global cultural and creative economy. His ideas challenge traditional ways of thinking about culture, creativity, and economics, providing concepts that could inspire more innovative and dynamic approaches. Here’s how Deleuze’s philosophy could inform a new cultural and creative economic philosophy:

Rhizomatic Thinking and Decentralization

Rhizome Concept: Deleuze, along with Félix Guattari, developed the idea of the *rhizome*, a non-hierarchical, networked way of thinking and organizing knowledge. In the context of the creative economy, this could translate to a more decentralized and non-linear approach to cultural production and distribution, where creativity emerges from multiple, interconnected sources rather than a single, top-down hierarchy.

Networked Creativity: The rhizomatic model aligns with the digital age, where creativity is increasingly networked, collaborative, and distributed across various platforms and communities. This could lead to a more inclusive and participatory creative economy that values diverse contributions and fosters innovation.

Becoming and Continuous Innovation

Concept of Becoming: Deleuze emphasizes the idea of becoming—a constant state of change and transformation. In the creative economy, this could inspire a philosophy that values continuous innovation and adaptability. Rather than seeing creativity as producing fixed products, it would be seen as an ongoing process of transformation, where cultural and creative practices are always in flux.

Fluid Identities and Roles: Deleuze’s idea of becoming also challenges fixed identities and roles, suggesting that creative professionals could embrace more fluid and hybrid careers, constantly redefining their work and themselves in response to changing circumstances.

Multiplicity and Pluralism

Multiplicity: Deleuze advocates for a philosophy of *multiplicity*, where multiple perspectives, voices, and realities coexist without being reduced to a single, dominant narrative. This is highly relevant for the global creative economy, where embracing cultural diversity and promoting a plurality of expressions are key to fostering a vibrant and inclusive creative landscape.

Cross-Cultural Collaboration: This concept supports the idea of cross-cultural collaboration and the blending of different traditions and practices, leading to innovative cultural products that reflect the complexity and diversity of global societies.

Deterritorialization and Globalization

Deterritorialization: Deleuze and Guattari’s idea of *deterritorialization* refers to the process of breaking free from traditional boundaries and constraints. In the context of the global creative economy, this could encourage the breaking down of national and cultural boundaries, leading to more fluid exchanges and collaborations across the globe.

Global Networks: This concept supports the creation of global networks of creativity that transcend geographical and cultural limitations, allowing for the free flow of ideas and cultural products across borders, while also being sensitive to the dynamics of reterritorialization, where local contexts reassert their influence.

Comment by Dokusō-tekina aidea on September 20, 2024 at 6:23pm

Immanence and Creativity

Immanence: Deleuze’s philosophy of immanence rejects the idea of transcendent ideals or fixed essences, focusing instead on the potentiality and creativity inherent in the present moment. This could lead to a philosophy of the creative economy that emphasizes the importance of creativity as a process rooted in the here and now, where value is generated through engagement, experimentation, and the lived experience of creation.

Process-Oriented Creativity: This approach would value the process of creation as much as, if not more than, the final product, encouraging an economy where the journey of creation is seen as intrinsically valuable.

Assemblage Theory and Interdisciplinary Practice

Assemblages: Deleuze’s concept of assemblages refers to the complex, dynamic constellations of elements—both human and non-human—that come together to form systems or entities. In the creative economy, this could translate to a focus on the interplay between various elements—technology, culture, economics, and politics—that together create the conditions for creative work.
Interdisciplinary Approaches: Assemblage theory could encourage more interdisciplinary approaches within the creative economy, where different fields and practices intersect to create new forms of cultural production.

Affirmative Ethics and Experimentation

Affirmative Ethics: Deleuze’s philosophy is often seen as affirmatively ethical, advocating for a life that embraces difference, creativity, and experimentation. This could lead to a creative economy that prioritizes ethical practices that are not just reactive but actively create new possibilities for living and working together.

Experimental Economies: This philosophy would support experimental economic models that challenge traditional capitalist frameworks, potentially fostering new forms of creative entrepreneurship that prioritize collective well-being and innovation over profit maximization.

Anti-Oedipal Creativity and Liberation

Anti-Oedipal Approach: Deleuze and Guattari’s critique of Oedipal structures in *Anti-Oedipus* suggests a move away from restrictive, hierarchical systems towards more liberated and expansive forms of expression. In the creative economy, this could inspire practices that resist conformity and embrace radical creativity, pushing boundaries in art, culture, and business.

Liberatory Practices: This aligns with a vision of the creative economy that seeks to liberate creativity from traditional constraints, allowing for more radical and unconventional forms of cultural expression.

Potential Role in a New Philosophy

Deleuze’s philosophy offers a vision of the creative economy that is dynamic, inclusive, and transformative. It encourages a break from traditional, hierarchical models and promotes a more fluid, networked, and process-oriented approach. Such a philosophy would not only embrace the diversity and complexity of global cultures but also foster continuous innovation, ethical practices, and the liberation of creativity from established norms.

This Deleuzian-inspired philosophy could guide the development of a global cultural and creative economy that is more responsive to the challenges and opportunities of the 21st century, emphasizing the importance of creativity as a force for social, cultural, and economic transformation.

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• …
• 5
• Next ›
• Page