註:

1 在台灣，practice 一詞一般會譯作「實際」，而 praxis 則譯作「實踐」。本文按台灣譯法。

參考文獻

許楓萱（2009）。《變色龍教師探尋之旅 ─一位高中教師實踐 A/r/tography 的敘說研究》（未出版博士論文）。國立台北教育大學，台北，台灣。

歐用生（2010）。《課程研究新視野》。台北，台灣：師大書苑。

Aoki, T. T. (2005). Curriculum in a new key: The collected works of Ted T. Aoki (W. F. Pinar & L. Irwin, Eds.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Connelly, F. M. (2009). Bridges from then to now and from them to us: Narrative threads on  the landscape of “the practical.” In E. C. Short & L. J. Waks (Eds.), Leaders in curriculum studies (pp. 39–54). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense.

Doll, M. A. (2000). Like letters in running water: A mythopoetics of curriculum. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Doll, W. (2005). The culture of method. In W. E. Doll, Jr., M. J. Fleener, D. Trueit, & J. St.

Julien (Eds.), Chaos, complexity, curriculum, and culture: A conversation (pp. 21–75). New York, NY: Peter Lang.

Eisner, E. W. (2002). The arts and the creation of mind. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Eisner, E. W. (2005). Reimagining schools: The selected works of Elliot W. Eisner. London, England; New York, NY: Routledge.

Garoian, C. R., & Gaudelius, Y. M. (2008). Spectacle pedagogy: Art, politics, and visual culture.Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

Giroux, H. A. (1999). Dialectics and the development of curriculum theory. In W. F. Pinar (Ed.), Contemporary curriculum discourses: Twenty years of JCT (pp. 7–23). New York, NY: Peter Lang.

Griffith, B. (2007). A philosophy of curriculum: The cautionary tale of simultaneous languages in a decentered world. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense.

Guyas, A. S. (2008). Water: Moving stillness. In S. Springgay, R. L. Irwin, C. Leggo, & P. Gouzouasis (Eds.), Being with a/r/tography (pp. 25–32). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense.

Haggerson, N. L., Jr. (2000). Expanding curriculum research and understanding: A mytho-poetic perspective. New York, NY: Peter Lang.

Holland, P. E., & Garman, N. B. (2008). Watching with two eyes: The place of the mythopoetic

in curriculum inquiry. In T. Leonard & P. Willis (Eds.), Pedagogies of the imagination: Mythopoetic curriculum in educational practice (pp. 11–29). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.

Huebner, D. (1966). Curriculum language and classroom meaning. In J. B. Macdonald & R. R. Leeper (Eds.), Language and meaning (pp. 8–27). Washington, DC: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Irwin, R. L. (2004). A/r/tography: A metonymic métissage. In R. L. Irwin & A. de Cosson (Eds.), A/r/tography: Rendering self through arts-based living inquiry (pp. 27–38). Vancouver, BC, Canada: Pacific Educational Press.

Irwin, R. L., & de Cosson, A. (Eds.). (2004). A/r/tography: Rendering self through arts-based living inquiry. Vancouver, BC, Canada: Pacific Educational Press.

Irwin, R. L., & Springgay, S. (2008). A/r/tography as practice-based research. In S. Springgay, L. Irwin, C. Leggo, & P. Gouzouasis (Eds.), Being with a/r/tography (pp. xix–xxxiii). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense.

Jardine, D. W., Friesen, S., & Clifford, P. (Eds.). (2006). Curriculum in abundance. Mahwah,NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Kesson, K. R. (1999). Toward a curriculum of mythopoetic meaning. In J. G. Henderson & K. R. Kesson (Eds.), Understanding democratic curriculum leadership (pp. 84–105). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

Leavy, P. (2009). Method meets art: Arts-based research practice. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Leggo, C. (2008). Autobiography: Researching our lives and living our research. In S. Springgay, L. Irwin, C. Leggo, & P. Gouzouasis (Eds.), Being with a/r/tography (pp. 3–23). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense.

Macdonald, J. B. (1988). Theory-practice and the hermeneutic circle. In W. F. Pinar (Ed.), Contemporary curriculum discourses (pp. 101–113). Scottsdale, AZ: Gorsuch Scarisbrick.

McLaren, P., & Jaramillo, N. (2007). Pedagogy and praxis in the age of empire: Towards a new humanism. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense.

Montgomery-Whicher, R. (2005). Aesthetic experiences. In M. van Manen (Ed.), Writing in the dark: Phenomenological studies in interpretive inquiry (pp. 27–47). London, England: Althouse Press.

Morris, M. (2008). Teaching through the ill body: A spiritual and aesthetic approach to pedagogy and illness. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense.

Pearse, H. (2004). Praxis in perspective. In R. L. Irwin & A. de Cosson (Eds.), A/r/tography: Rendering self through arts-based living inquiry (pp. 184–197). Vancouver, BC, Canada: Pacific Educational Press.

Pinar, W. F. (1988). Introduction. In W. F. Pinar (Ed.), Contemporary curriculum discourses (pp. 1–13). Scottsdale, AZ: Gorsuch Scarisbrick.

Pinar, W. F., & Grumet, M. R. (1988). Socratic caesure and the theory-practice relationship. In W. F. Pinar (Ed.), Contemporary curriculum discourses (pp. 92–100). Scottsdale, AZ: Gorsuch Scarisbrick.

Pinnegar, S., & Hamilton, M. L. (2009). Self-study of practice as a genre of qualitative research: Theory, methodology, and practice. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.

Reason, P., & Hawkins, P. (1988). Storytelling as inquiry. In P. Reason (Ed.), Human inquiry in action: Developments in new paradigm research (pp. 79–101). London, England: Sage.

Roy, K. (2003). Teachers in nomadic spaces: Deleuze and curriculum. New York, NY: Peter Lang.

Schwab, J. J. (1969). The practical: A language for curriculum. The School Review, 78(1), 1–23.

Springgay, S. (2008). Body knowledge and curriculum: Pedagogies of touch in youth and visualculture. New York, NY: Peter Lang.

Springgay, S., Irwin, R. L., & Kind, S. (2008). A/r/tographers and living inquiry. In J. G. Knowles & A. L. Cole (Eds.), Handbook of the arts in qualitative research: Perspectives, methodologies, examples, and issues (pp. 83–91). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

Stenhouse, L. (1975). An introduction to curriculum research and development. London, England: Heinemann.

Swanson, D. M. (2007). Slicing voices, slicing bodies: Difference and disadvantage in schooling contexts. In S. Springgay & D. Freedman (Eds.), Curriculum and the cultural body (pp. 63–78). New York, NY: Peter Lang.

van Manen, M. (2002). Writing in the dark. In M. van Manen (Ed.), Writing in the dark:Phenomenological studies in interpretive inquiry (pp. 237–252). London, England: Althouse Press.