Comment

Comment by 家 在這裡 4 hours ago

譯成繁体中文：

 The letter I chose was that in which St. Preux describes his feelings as he first caught a glimpse from the heights of the Jura of the Pays de Vaud, which I had brought with me as a bon bouche to crown the evening with. It was my birth-day, and I had for the first time come from a place in the neighbourhood to visit this delightful spot. The road to Llangollen turns off between Chirk and Wrexham; and on passing a certain point you come all at once upon the valley, which opens like an amphitheatre, broad, barren hills rising in majestic state on either side, with "green upland swells that echo to the bleat of flocks" below, and the river Dee babbling over its stony bed in the midst of them. The valley at this time "glittered green with sunny showers," and a budding ash-tree dipped its tender branches in the chiding stream. How proud, how glad I was to walk along the high road that overlooks the delicious prospect, repeating the lines which I have just quoted from Mr. Coleridge's poems! But besides the prospect which opened beneath my feet, another also opened to my inward sight, a heavenly vision, on which were written, in letters large as Hope could make them, these four words, LIBERTY, GENIUS, LOVE, VIRTUE; which have since faded into the light of common day, or mock my idle gaze.

"The beautiful is vanished, and returns not."

Still I would return some time or other to this enchanted spot; but I would return to it alone. What other self could I find to share that influx of thoughts, of regret, and delight, the fragments of which I could hardly conjure up to myself, so much have they been broken and defaced. I could stand on some tall rock, and overlook the precipice of years that separates me from what I then was. I was at that time going shortly to visit the poet whom I have above named. Where is he now? Not only I myself have changed; the world which was then new to me, has become old and incorrigible. Yet will I turn to thee in thought, O sylvan Dee, in joy, in youth and gladness as thou then wert; and thou shalt always be to me the river of Paradise, where I will drink of the waters of life freely!

There is hardly anything that shows the shortsightedness or capriciousness of the imagination more than travelling does. With change of place we change our ideas; nay, our opinions and feelings. We can by an effort indeed transport ourselves to old and long-forgotten scenes, and then the picture of the mind revives again; but we forget those that we have just left.

Comment by 家 在這裡 4 hours ago

我所選讀的那封信，是聖普雷（St. Preux）描述自己初次從汝拉山（Jura）的高處，瞥見沃州（Pays de Vaud）時內心感受的那一封。我特意把它帶來，作為今晚的壓軸佳餚，為這個夜晚增添一抹餘韻。那天是我的生日，也是我第一次從附近的一個地方來到這處令人心醉的勝景遊覽。

前往蘭戈倫（Llangollen）的道路，在奇克（Chirk）與雷克瑟姆（Wrexham）之間岔出；當你經過某個特定的地點時，眼前突然豁然展開一座山谷，宛如一座天然的露天劇場。兩側是寬廣而荒涼的山丘，以莊嚴雄偉的姿態拔地而起；山丘下方，則是「青翠的高地連綿起伏，迴盪著羊群的咩叫聲」，而迪河（River Dee）就在其間，潺潺流過滿布石塊的河床。

此時此刻，整座山谷在「陽光灑落的陣雨中，閃耀著一片翠綠」；一株剛萌芽的梣樹，將柔嫩的枝條探入那條潺潺作響、彷彿帶著責備聲調的溪流。

啊，當我沿著俯瞰這片令人心醉的景色的大道漫步，反覆吟誦剛才引述的柯勒律治（Mr. Coleridge）詩句時，心中是何等驕傲，又是何等歡欣！

然而，除了腳下豁然展開的景色之外，另一幅景象也在我的內心視野中展開——那是一幅天國般的幻景。其上以希望所能寫出的最大字體，赫然寫著四個字：

自由（LIBERTY）、天才（GENIUS）、愛（LOVE）、美德（VIRTUE）。

然而，這四個字自此以後，已逐漸消融在平凡日子的光亮之中，或者，如今反倒成了嘲弄我徒然凝望的幻影。

「美麗已然消逝，永不復返。」

儘管如此，我仍希望有朝一日能重返這處如夢似幻的地方；但我希望獨自一人回去。我還能找到另一個與我相契的自我，來共同分享那一瞬間湧入心頭的思想、惆悵與歡愉嗎？那些感受的片段，我如今甚至難以在心中重新拼湊，因為它們早已破碎、磨損，面目全非。

我可以站在某塊高聳的岩石上，俯瞰那道歲月的懸崖——它將今日的我，與當年那個自己隔絕開來。

那時，我正準備不久後去拜訪上文提及的那位詩人。他如今身在何處呢？

改變的，不只是我自己；那個當年對我而言仍然嶄新的世界，如今也已變得老舊，而且積習難改。

然而，啊，林木環繞的迪河（sylvan Dee），我仍會在思緒中轉向你，想起你當年那副模樣：歡樂、青春、朝氣蓬勃。

對我而言，你將永遠是樂園之河；在那裡，我可以自由地暢飲生命之水！

旅行，幾乎沒有什麼比它更能顯示想像力的短視與反覆無常了。

隨著地點的轉換，我們的觀念也跟著改變；不僅如此，就連我們的意見與感受，也會隨之改變。

誠然，只要稍加努力，我們仍能將自己帶回那些古老而早已遺忘的場景，於是，心靈中的畫面便會再次復活；然而，對於那些我們才剛剛離開的景象，我們卻已經忘記了。

Comment by 家 在這裡 yesterday

It seems that we can think but of one place at a time. The canvas of the fancy is but of a certain extent, and if we paint one set of objects upon it, they immediately efface every other. We cannot enlarge our conceptions, we only shift our point of view. The landscape bares its bosom to the enraptured eye, we take our fill of it, and seem as if we could form no other image of beauty or grandeur. We pass on, and think no more of it: the horizon that shuts it from our sight, also blots it from our memory like a dream. In travelling through a wild barren country I can form no idea of a woody and cultivated one. It appears to me that all the world must be barren, like what I see of it. In the country we forget the town, and in town we despise the country. "Beyond Hyde Park," says Sir Topling Flutter, "all is a desert." All that part of the map that we do not see before us is a blank. The world in our conceit of it is not much bigger than a nutshell. It is not one prospect expanded into another, county joined to county, kingdom to kingdom, lands to seas, making an image voluminous and vast; -- the mind can form no larger idea of space than the eye can take in at a single glance. The rest is a name written in a map, a calculation of arithmetic. For instance, what is the true signification of that immense mass of territory and population known by the name of China to us? An inch of pasteboard on a wooden globe, of no more account than a China orange! Things near us are seen of the size of life: things at a distance are diminished to the size of the understanding. We measure the universe by ourselves, and even comprehend the texture of our being only piece-meal. In this way, however, we remember an infinity of things and places. The mind is like a mechanical instrument that plays a great variety of tunes, but it must play them in succession. One idea recalls another, but it at the same time excludes all others. In trying to renew old recollections, we cannot as it were unfold the whole web of our existence; we must pick out the single threads. So in coming to a place where we have formerly lived, and with which we have intimate associations, every one must have found that the feeling grows more vivid the nearer we approach the spot, from the mere anticipation of the actual impression: we remember circumstances, feelings, persons, faces, names that we had not thought of for years; but for the time all the rest of the world is forgotten! -- To return to the question I have quitted above:

 

I have no objection to go to see ruins, aqueducts, pictures, in company with a friend or a party, but rather the contrary, for the former reason reversed. They are intelligible matters, and will bear talking about. The sentiment here is not tacit, but communicable and overt. Salisbury Plain is barren of criticism, but Stonehenge will bear a discussion antiquarian, picturesque, and philosophical. In setting out on a party of pleasure, the first consideration always is where we shall go to: in taking a solitary ramble, the question is what we shall meet with by the way. "The mind is its own place "; nor are we anxious to arrive at the end of our journey.

I can myself do the honours indifferently well to works of art and curiosity. I once took a party to Oxford with no mean éclat -- showed them that seat of the Muses at a distance,

Comment by 家 在這裡 yesterday

想像的畫布與記憶的疆界

我們似乎一次只能思考一個地方。想像的畫布只有一定的幅度；一旦我們在上面描繪了一組景物，它們便會立即抹去其他所有景象。我們無法真正擴大自己的觀念，只能不斷轉換觀看的角度。

眼前的風景向那雙為之陶醉的眼睛敞開胸懷，我們盡情飽覽，彷彿再也無法想像另一種美或壯麗的景象。然而，我們繼續前行，便不再想起它。那道將它隔絕於視線之外的地平線，也如同抹去一場夢境般，將它從記憶中一併擦除。

當我行經一片荒涼貧瘠的原野時，便無法想像另一片林木茂密、經過耕作開墾的土地。在我看來，整個世界似乎都必定是荒蕪的，就像眼前所見的這片土地一樣。

身在鄉野，我們便忘了城鎮；置身城鎮，我們又瞧不起鄉野。正如托普林・弗拉特爵士（Sir Topling Flutter）所說：「海德公園以外，盡是一片荒漠。」

凡是地圖上沒有呈現在我們眼前的部分，對我們而言，都是一片空白。

我們想像中的世界，其實並不比一顆堅果大多少。

世界並不是一幅不斷向外延展、彼此銜接的景觀：一個郡接著另一個郡，一個王國連著另一個王國，陸地延伸至海洋，從而構成一幅遼闊無垠、層層展開的圖像。事實上，心靈所能形成的空間觀念，並不比眼睛一瞥之間所能容納的範圍更大。

其餘的一切，不過是寫在地圖上的一個地名，或是一道算術計算題。

例如，對我們而言，那片以「中國」之名所認識的、擁有如此廣袤疆域與龐大人口的土地，究竟具有什麼真正的意義？

在一個木製地球儀上，它不過是紙板上小小的一英寸，與一顆中國橘子相比，也沒有什麼更大的分量！

近在眼前的事物，以生命原有的真實尺寸呈現在我們面前；遠方的事物，則被縮減到我們理解力所能容納的尺寸。

我們以自身為尺度衡量宇宙，甚至連自身存在的構造，也只能一部分、一部分地理解。

然而，儘管如此，我們仍然記得無數的事物與地方。

心靈就像一件機械樂器，能夠演奏各式各樣的曲調，但它必須依次演奏。一個觀念喚起另一個觀念，卻也在同一時間排除了其他所有觀念。

當我們試圖重新喚回昔日的記憶時，彷彿無法將整張生命之網一次完整地展開；我們必須一根一根地抽取其中的絲線。

因此，當我們來到一個曾經居住過、並與自己有著深厚情感聯繫的地方時，每個人想必都曾有過這樣的經驗：愈接近那個地點，感受便愈發鮮明，即使僅僅是因為預期即將親身感受到它所帶來的印象。

我們會重新想起一些多年來未曾想起的情境、感受、人物、面孔與姓名；然而，就在那一刻，世界上其他一切事物卻全都被我們遺忘了！

——現在，讓我回到前面暫時擱下的問題：

我並不反對與朋友或一群同伴結伴去觀賞古蹟、渡槽或繪畫；事實上，我倒是相當樂意，甚至可以說，理由恰好與前面所談的情況相反。

這些都是可以理解、可以談論的事物。此時此刻的感受，不是沉默而隱微的，而是可以交流、可以公開表達的。

索爾茲伯里平原（Salisbury Plain）本身沒有什麼可供評論的；但巨石陣（Stonehenge）卻足以引發一場考古學、風景美學與哲學層面的討論。

當我們結伴出遊、尋求歡樂時，首先考慮的總是：我們要去哪裡？

但當我們獨自漫步時，真正的問題卻是：沿途我們會遇見什麼？

「心靈自有其天地」（The mind is its own place）；而且，我們也不急於抵達旅程的終點。

至於我自己，對於藝術品與各種奇珍異物的欣賞與介紹，倒也還算稱職。

有一次，我帶領一群同伴前往牛津，這趟行程相當成功，頗受好評——我在遠處向他們展示那座繆思女神的殿堂……

Comment by 家 在這裡 yesterday

"With glistering spires and pinnacles adorn'd --"

descanted on the learned air that breathes from the grassy quadrangles and stone walls of halls and colleges -- was at home in the Bodleian; and at Blenheim quite superseded the powdered Cicerone that attended us, and that pointed in vain with his wand to commonplace beauties in matchless pictures. As another exception to the above reasoning, I should not feel confident in venturing on a journey in a foreign country without a companion. I should want at intervals to hear the sound of my own language. There is an involuntary antipathy in the mind of an Englishman to foreign manners and notions that requires the assistance of social sympathy to carry it off. As the distance from home increases, this relief, which was at first a luxury, becomes a passion and an appetite. A person would almost feel stifled to find himself in the deserts of Arabia without friends and countrymen: there must be allowed to be something in the view of Athens or old Rome that claims the utterance of speech; and I own that the Pyramids are too mighty for any single contemplation. In such situations, so opposite to all one's ordinary train of ideas, one seems a species by one's-self, a limb torn off from society, unless one can meet with instant fellowship and support. -- Yet I did not feel this want or craving very pressing once, when I first set my foot on the laughing shores of France. Calais was peopled with novelty and delight. The confused, busy murmur of the place was like oil and wine poured into my ears; nor did the mariners' hymn, which was sung from the top of an old crazy vessel in the harbour, as the sun went down, send an alien sound into my soul. I only breathed the air of general humanity. I walked over "the vine-covered hills and gay regions of France," erect and satisfied; for the image of man was not cast down and chained to the foot of arbitrary thrones: I was at no loss for language, for that of all the great schools of painting was open to me. The whole is vanished like a shade. Pictures, heroes, glory, freedom, all are fled: nothing remains but the Bourbons and the French people! -- There is undoubtedly a sensation in travelling into foreign parts that is to be had nowhere else; but it is more pleasing at the time than lasting. It is too remote from our habitual associations to be a common topic of discourse or reference, and, like a dream or another state of existence, does not piece into our daily modes of life. It is an animated but a momentary hallucination. It demands an effort to exchange our actual for our ideal identity; and to feel the pulse of our old transports revive very keenly, we must "jump" all our present comforts and connexions.

Comment by 家 在這裡 yesterday

「飾以閃耀的尖塔與高聳的塔頂——」

他曾以學者般優雅的語調，吟詠著那股從草木青翠的四方庭院，以及學院與講堂的石牆間散發出來的學術氣息；他在牛津的博德利圖書館（Bodleian Library）如魚得水；到了布倫海姆宮（Blenheim Palace），更是完全取代了那位陪同我們參觀、頭戴撲粉假髮的導覽員。那位導覽員徒勞地揮動手杖，指點著那些無與倫比的畫作中平庸尋常的美景。

作為前述論點的另一個例外，我不敢肯定自己若沒有同伴，是否有勇氣獨自踏上異國之旅。我會希望每隔一段時間，能夠聽見自己的母語。英國人的心靈對外國人的習俗與觀念，多少存有一種不由自主的反感；唯有藉助人與人之間的情感共鳴，才能化解這種隔閡。離家愈遠，這種原先只是奢侈享受的慰藉，便愈逐漸轉化為一種熱切的渴望，甚至成為精神上的需求。

一個人若發現自己孤零零地置身於阿拉伯沙漠，身邊既沒有朋友，也沒有同胞，幾乎會感到窒息。我們不能不承認，當人眺望雅典或古羅馬時，心中總有某種情懷，非得藉由言語表達不可；我也承認，金字塔的雄偉壯闊，實在不是單憑一個人的凝視所能承受的。在這些與日常思想軌跡截然相反的地方，人彷彿自成一種孤立的物種，像是一條被從社會身體上撕裂下來的肢體；除非能即刻找到志趣相投的同伴與精神上的支持，否則便會有如此孤絕的感受。

然而，當我第一次踏上法國那片歡欣明媚的海岸時，卻絲毫沒有感受到這種迫切的匱乏或渴求。

加萊（Calais）充滿了新奇與喜悅。那地方紛雜而忙碌的人聲喧嘩，彷彿油與美酒一同傾注進我的耳中；黃昏時分，港灣裡一艘破舊搖晃的船隻頂端傳來水手們的頌歌，也絲毫沒有在我的心靈中激起異鄉的陌生感。我所呼吸的，只是普遍人性的氣息。

我昂首闊步，心滿意足地走過「法國那片葡萄藤蔓覆蓋的山丘與歡樂的土地」。因為人的形象，並未被貶抑，也未被鎖鏈束縛在專制王座的腳下。我並不愁於語言不通，因為所有偉大繪畫流派所使用的語言，對我而言都是敞開的。

然而，這一切都已如幻影般消逝。

繪畫、英雄、榮耀、自由，全都遠去了；如今所剩下的，只有波旁王朝與法國人民！

毫無疑問，遠赴異國旅行，確實能帶來一種別處無從體驗的感受；然而，這種感受當下固然令人愉悅，卻難以長久留存。它與我們日常生活中的慣常聯想相距太遠，以致無法成為日常談話或思想交流中經常提及的話題。它就像一場夢，或另一種存在狀態，無法真正銜接我們日復一日的生活方式。

那是一種充滿生氣、卻轉瞬即逝的幻覺。

要從現實中的自我轉換成理想中的自我，必須付出一番心力；而若想讓昔日那些狂喜與激情的脈搏，再度強烈地跳動起來，我們就必須「跳離」當下所擁有的一切舒適生活與人際聯繫。

譯註：

這段文字出自英國散文家威廉・赫茲利特（William Hazlitt）的遊記散文《論旅行》（On Going a Journey，1822）。

Comment by 家 在這裡 on September 29, 2026 at 9:35pm

英國散文家威廉·赫茲利特（William Hazlitt）所著《論旅行》（On Going a Journey）經典名篇

Our romantic and itinerant character is not to be domesticated. Dr. Johnson remarked how little foreign travel added to the facilities of conversation in those who had been abroad. In fact, the time we have spent there is both delightful, and in one sense instructive; but it appears to be cut out of our substantial, downright existence, and never to join kindly on to it. We are not the same, but another, and perhaps more enviable individual, all the time we are out of our own country. We are lost to ourselves, as well as our friends. So the poet somewhat quaintly sings,

"Out of my country and myself I go."

Those who wish to forget painful thoughts, do well to absent themselves for a while from the ties and objects that recall them; but we can be said only to fulfil our destiny in the place that gave us birth. I should on this account like well enough to spend the whole of my life in travelling abroad, if I could anywhere borrow another life to spend afterwards at home!

我們的浪漫與浪跡天涯的天性，是無法被馴服的。強森博士曾評論道，那些出過國的人，國外旅行對他們談吐能力的提升微乎其微。事實上，我們在國外度過的時光雖然歡愉，且在某種意義上深具啟發性，但它似乎是從我們踏實、平凡的現實生活中硬生生裁切出來的，永遠無法與之完美融合。在離開自己國家的這段時間裡，我們不再是原來的自己，而是變成了另一個、或許更令人羨慕的人。我們不僅與朋友失去聯繫，也迷失了自我。正如詩人帶點奇特幽默地唱道：

「我走出了我的國家，也走出了我自己。」

對於那些想要忘卻痛苦思緒的人來說，暫時遠離那些會勾起回憶的羈絆與事物確實是明智之舉；然而，我們唯有在孕育自己的土地上，才稱得上是在履行生命的宿命。正因如此，如果我能從某處借來另一段生命在日後留守家園，我倒非常樂意將這輩子所有的時光，都花在異國的旅途中！

愛墾評註：「國外旅行對他們談吐能力的提升微乎其微。」這一句，讓人想起Agnes Callard的〈反對旅行〉

Comment by 家 在這裡 on July 13, 2026 at 8:49am

[iCONADA Research Team]Bandar Keluarga Bahagia Kudat: Rethinking Happiness Through Community, Place, and Cultural Identity

In an era when cities are increasingly evaluated through economic output, infrastructure, and technological advancement, the recognition of Kudat, Sabah, as one of Malaysia's officially designated Bandar Bahagia (Happy Town) invites a different conversation. Rather than measuring success solely through urban growth or financial prosperity, Kudat demonstrates how collective well-being can emerge from strong family relationships, community participation, environmental harmony, and a slower rhythm of life. Its identity as Bandar Keluarga Bahagia Kudat (Kudat, the Happy Family Town) reflects a broader cultural philosophy in which happiness is understood as a social condition rather than merely an individual achievement.

Located at the northernmost tip of the island of Borneo, Kudat occupies a unique geographical position within the Malaysian state of Sabah. Surrounded by the South China Sea and the Sulu Sea, the district is defined by coastal landscapes, fishing villages, agricultural settlements, and an intimate town centre that remains largely untouched by the congestion associated with Malaysia's major metropolitan areas. This geographical isolation, often perceived as economic disadvantage within conventional models of development, instead becomes a source of cultural resilience. Distance from rapid urbanisation has allowed Kudat to preserve forms of everyday social interaction that have gradually diminished elsewhere.

The official recognition of Kudat as a Happy City was awarded by Malaysia's Ministry of Housing and Local Government (Kementerian Perumahan dan Kerajaan Tempatan, KPKT) through the Malaysian Happiness Index (Indeks Kebahagiaan Malaysia). The assessment considers not only physical infrastructure but also governance, environmental quality, public services, social cohesion, safety, and community satisfaction. Kudat's municipal authority, the Kudat Town Board (Lembaga Bandaran Kudat), has consistently maintained strong performance across these indicators, illustrating that successful local governance depends as much upon civic participation and public trust as upon administrative efficiency.

One of the most significant reasons for Kudat's recognition lies in its culture of community engagement. The Kudat Town Board received national recognition for excellence in community participation and resident consultation, demonstrating an approach to governance that values dialogue rather than top-down administration.

Comment by 家 在這裡 on July 13, 2026 at 8:43am

This emphasis reflects an important cultural principle within many Malaysian communities: social harmony is cultivated when citizens are treated as active participants in shaping their shared environment rather than passive recipients of government policy. Happiness, in this context, is produced collectively through relationships between institutions and the people they serve.

The surrounding natural environment further shapes Kudat's cultural identity. The district is internationally recognised for the Tip of Borneo (Tanjung Simpang Mengayau), where the South China Sea meets the Sulu Sea. More than a tourist destination, this dramatic coastal landscape functions as a symbolic space where residents experience continuity with nature. Beaches, open horizons, and relatively unspoiled ecosystems contribute to psychological well-being while reinforcing traditional relationships with the sea through fishing, maritime livelihoods, and cultural memory. In this sense, nature is not merely scenery but an active participant in the production of happiness.

From a cultural perspective, Kudat challenges dominant assumptions about what constitutes a successful modern city. Contemporary urban discourse frequently equates progress with population density, commercial expansion, and technological sophistication. Yet Kudat suggests that these indicators alone cannot adequately explain human flourishing. A community may possess fewer economic opportunities while maintaining higher levels of social trust, stronger family cohesion, and greater satisfaction with everyday life. Its recognition as a Happy City therefore questions development models that prioritise economic growth without equal attention to social relationships and cultural continuity.

Kudat also illustrates how Malaysia's multicultural character contributes to its social resilience. The district is home to diverse indigenous communities, including the Rungus people, alongside Malay, Chinese, and other ethnic groups whose histories have long intersected through trade, agriculture, and coastal settlement. Rather than erasing cultural difference, everyday coexistence has fostered shared practices of mutual respect and cooperation. This multicultural environment demonstrates that happiness is sustained not through cultural uniformity but through the successful negotiation of diversity within a common civic identity.

Nevertheless, the concept of a "Happy City" should not be accepted uncritically. Official happiness indices inevitably simplify complex lived experiences, reducing emotional, economic, and cultural realities into measurable indicators. While recognition reflects genuine strengths in governance and community life, it cannot fully capture inequalities, youth migration, employment challenges, or the aspirations of residents whose experiences may differ from statistical averages. Happiness, therefore, remains both an administrative category and a contested cultural idea. The designation should be understood less as a declaration of perfection than as an ongoing aspiration requiring continuous community engagement and responsive governance.

Ultimately, Bandar Keluarga Bahagia Kudat represents more than a municipal accolade. It offers an alternative vision of development in which prosperity is inseparable from belonging, environmental stewardship, cultural continuity, and meaningful social relationships. Kudat reminds us that the measure of a successful community lies not only in its economic indicators but also in its capacity to cultivate trust, preserve identity, and create conditions in which families and communities can genuinely flourish. In doing so, the town contributes to a wider cultural critique of contemporary urban life, suggesting that happiness is not something purchased through modernity alone, but something patiently sustained through people, place, and shared values.

Comment by 家 在這裡 on June 4, 2026 at 9:27pm

[愛墾研創·嫣然]藍色浪潮與文化自覺：論沙巴文創轉型中「獨中教育」的生態位移與主體性建構

沙巴州政府將創意產業定位為驅動全州發展的「新引擎」，並同步開拓「藍色經濟（Blue Economy）」的永續藍海。這雙重戰略的交匯，正深刻重塑東馬的文化與教育版圖。

長期以來，身處「風下之鄉」的沙巴，其豐富的三十多個原住民族群文化（如嘉達山杜順族、穆魯特族與巴瑤族等）在國家主流敘事中，往往被定格為觀光手冊上的定型符號或「東馬異國情調」的點綴。然而，沙巴首席部長拿督斯里哈芝芝諾近期透過[沙巴進步繁榮（SMJ）發展藍圖]，宣示將創意內容、數位經濟與知識型產業視為新一代發展核心。在這場深刻的文化邊緣體系主體性建構中，沙巴華文獨立中學（獨中）正迎來前所未有的角色蛻變——從傳統的「華社文化堡壘」，晉升為「在地文創人才孵化基地」與「跨文化生態敘事轉譯者」的核心生態位。傳統符號的資本化解構：從「展示」到「生態敘事」的跨越

傳統的文化保護政策，往往傾向將文化封存於博物館或特定文化村中進行静態展示。這種做法雖然能延續物件與儀式的外在形式，卻割裂了文化與當代社會生產力的有機聯繫。哈芝芝政府此次推動的政策，其核心在於「妥善轉化沙巴故事」，並將其與 [海洋溫差能（OTEC）]等前沿綠色科技相結合。

在這一脈絡下，沙巴的 9 所華文獨中展現了獨特的教育主體性。獨中生長年接受「三語並重」的雙軌制教育，這使他們天然具備跨語境的文化轉譯能力。他們不僅能深刻理解巴瑤族的海洋智慧與嘉達山族的土地倫理，更能運用華語、英語與馬來語，將這些在地的永續共生故事，對接到西方前沿的「藍色經濟循環模型」或全球華人市場。這是一次將文化從「被動展示」轉為主動「生態敘事」的跨越，讓婆羅洲文化不再只是被凝視的客體，而是成為在全球環境與文化產業鏈中流動的高價值產品。

主體性的雙重錨定：對內青年賦能與對外區域團結

從文化評論的角度審視，這項融合了教育資源的「新引擎」戰略，其高明之處在於其內外兼顧的雙重錨定效應：

對內：科技與人文交融的青年賦能：沙巴青年過往面臨高附加值就業機會匱乏、人才外流的制度性困境。當前，沙巴政府正全力扶持 [沙巴創意協會聯合會（KREATIF SABAH）] 與沙巴創意經濟與創新中心（SCENIC）。沙巴獨中憑藉卓越的跨學科（STEAM）教育與理科優勢，能引導學生將硬核的海洋保育、環保科學轉化為數位動畫、科普短片或文創產品。青年不再只是政策的被動受益者，更成為掌握文化與科技詮釋權的「變革推手」。

對外：婆羅洲共同體的戰略互聯：沙巴的這一文創轉型，與鄰近的砂拉越、印尼新首都努山塔拉等大婆羅洲板塊形成了隱形共振。深耕於沙巴各市鎮與邊陲交界點的獨中（如古達培正中學、山打根育源中學等），透過校園社區化，帶領學生深入红樹林復育、參與海事歷史調查。這種在地實踐在文化與經濟層面強化了「婆羅洲主體性」，有助於東馬在以西馬為中心的國家主流話語體系中，取得更具分量的對等話語權。

面臨的挑戰：市場資本化與文化本真性的博弈

然而，任何文化披上「經濟引擎」與「生態旅遊」的外衣時，都不可避免地會遭遇市場異化的風險。當婆羅洲故事與海洋景觀被封裝進入高度商業化的消費市場時，創作者是否會為了迎合全球大眾的審美口味，而主動修剪文化中那些獨特、深邃但略顯晦澀的本真性？

在這一博弈中，沙巴獨中的「非營利華社教育機構」屬性，恰好為市場提供了必要的煞車機制。獨中天然的公益與文化守護特性，使其能夠在文創旅遊開發中扮演「文化守門人」的角色。學校通過教育引導青年創作者在追求數位經濟紅利的同時，堅守本土歷史的尊嚴，確保在地族群的海洋與土地歷史不被市場過度消費與扭曲。

結語

沙巴將創意產業與藍色經濟列為新引擎，並給予 [獨中統考文憑（UEC）高度的體制信任與獎學金支持]，這絕非僅是在追求一組亮眼的 GDP 數據，而是在全球化浪潮中爭奪本土文化的定義權。

通過將古老的婆羅洲敘事、現代數位科技與獨中的三語教育進行有機化學反應，沙巴正向世界證明：文化遺產與教育體制不是沉重的歷史包袱，而是迎向綠色與藍色未來時，最堅韌且充滿生機的雙翼。

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• …
• 6
• Next ›
• Page